Cephalopod ink release is presumed to function as a visual defense. A dense, mucous-bound pseudomorph ('false-body') that mimics the releaser or a smokescreen/cloud that blocks the releaser from view is released and confuses a predator while the cephalopod escapes. Unfortunately the 'obvious' visual effectiveness of shallow-water cephalopod ink release means empircal tests regarding the effectiveness against natural cephalopod predators have not been performed. Recently I documented ink release by numerous deep-sea squid, including ink release forms that had not been previously described (Bush & Robison, 2007). Why deep-sea squids release ink in the deep sea is currently unknown. Light levels rapidly decrease with water depth, therefore by 1000 m in even the clearest oceanic water no surface-derived light remains - for most of the ocean, this depth is considerably shallower. Ink release seems useless as a visual defense. Some researchers have suggested the possibility that deterrent or attractant chemicals may play a
role in ink release. Whether deep-sea squid ink release has a visual and/or chemical function remains to be determined. However, it is likely an effective defense. If not, deep-sea squids would likely have lost the ability to produce and/or release ink over evolutionary time, which has occurred for many deep-sea octopuses. To address these questions, I am testing the reaction of cephalopod predators to both shallow and deep-water squid ink to determine whether one or both groups produce chemicals that affect potential predators. |