LOOKING INTO THE UC BUDGET -- Report #3 (e-mail version)
by Charles Schwartz, Department of Physics, University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720. 510-642-4427 February 7, 1993
SUMMARY
This report extends the previous study of the University of California's
administrative bureaucracy (Report #2) by presenting individual data
for each of the nine UC campuses, showing the historical inflation of
administrative budgets and their current high levels of expenditure.
For each of the campuses one can see evidence of substantial
administrative bloat; but there are large variations in the magnitude of
this problem from one campus to another.
The three oldest and most esteemed UC campuses - those at
Berkeley, Los Angeles and San Francisco - show the greatest excess
in growth of the administration compared to that of the instructional
part of the campus budget. And these same campuses also show the
highest current rate of expenditure for administration.
UCLA leads the pack with 1991-92 expenditures for administration of
$98,093,000 ; while the systemwide Office of the President comes in
second with $79,564,000; and Berkeley comes in third with
$74,063,000.
The large amount of data is presented in a variety of numerical and
graphical forms, both following and expanding upon the format of the
previous study.
The conclusion is that UC is faced with not just one but a tenfold
complex of Augean stables that need to be cleaned out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report #1 in this series (December 10, 1992; 2 pages) dealt with a single
administrative unit: the Office of the General Counsel of the Regents, which
consists of 37 attorneys, plus staff, and spent $9,174,000 in fiscal year
1991-92. Over the past 15 years, this office has grown two to three times more
than the clientele it is presumed to serve. In addition, 7 out of the 12
campuses and major laboratories run by UC now have their own legal officer(s)
as Assistant Chancellors, etc., while there was only one such officer 15 years
ago. This indicates a severe case of bureaucratic bloat that ought to be
questioned.
Report #2 (January 4, 1993; 8 pages) covered the entire upper-level
administration of the University. Comparative growth in budgeted positions
(FTE) was analyzed over the last 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years; and it was
estimated that perhaps half of the present size of UC's administration is
excess bureaucratic bloat that has grown unchallenged for decades and now
wastes large amounts of scarce funding that is needed for the university's
primary academic functions. The total expenditure for this administration in
1991-92 amounted to $523,508,000. The recommendation was that outside
management experts be brought in to study and identify precisely where UC's
administration should be trimmed.
Report #2a (January 19, 1993; 6 pages) studied the University's first response
to Report #2. It was shown that 94% of the money expended on administration in
UC came from funds which are entirely under the control of the Regents and
allocated at their discretion, thus demolishing the one excuse offered by
President Peltason for not taking the conclusions and recommendation of the
previous report seriously.
Charles Schwartz, Professor Emeritus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE NEW DATA
The last ten pages of this Report present the detailed data for each of
the nine UC campuses, plus the systemwide administration, in exactly the same
way as used in Report #2 for the university as a whole. (The reader should
refer back to that document for definitions, references and general analysis of
this data.)
Pages 5 and 6 of this Report present the most salient information in a
more compact manner that allows easy comparison among the campuses. The first
five bar graphs show the percentage growth in just two UC budget categories -
Administration and Instruction - for each of the time periods - the past 5
years, the past 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, 25 years - and for each of the
nine campuses - UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Irvine, UC Los Angeles, UC Riverside,
UC San Diego, UC San Francisco, UC Santa Barbara, and UC Santa Cruz.
In these graphs, I have combined the data for the two budget categories,
"General Administration" and "Institutional Support", which are the two
components of what I call simply "Administration."
Remember that this definition of "Administration" covers only the top
level of bureaucracy on each campus: the Chancellor's office and the campus-
wide administrative offices directly controlled by the various Vice
Chancellors. This does not include administrative services at the level of
academic departments or research units; those are counted in the "Instruction"
or "Research" budget categories. Nor does this definition of "Administration"
include the many other campus support services which are budgeted under the
separate headings of Academic Support, Libraries, Operation and Maintenance of
Plant, Student Services, Auxiliary Enterprises, and Student Financial Aid.
In looking at these five bar graphs note that the vertical axis, showing
percentage growth, has a different numerical scale for each time period. This
is due to the cumulative nature of the growth statistics that we are examining.
Over the past five years (as shown in the first graph) the average growths are
about 20%; over the past ten years, about 40%; over the past fifteen years,
about 60%; over the past twenty years, about 100%; and over the past twenty-
five years, the average growths have amounted to about 150%.
The last bar graph on page 6 presents the total administrative
expenditures for 1991-92, in millions of dollars, for each of the nine campuses.
As in Report #2, these numbers come from the accounting document "Campus
Financial Schedules"; and the figures given are the sum of Total Current Funds
Expenditures for "Institutional Support" plus "Academic Administration" (Deans'
Offices.)
DISCUSSION of the CAMPUS DATA
What we see in these graphs is a lot of growth in Administration at each
campus as well as a lot of variation in the magnitude of this growth from one
campus to another and from one time period to another. Remember, as discussed
in Report #2, that the critical question to ask is not, Why does the
Administrative portion of the budget grow faster than the Instructional portion?
but rather, Why does the Administrative budget grow at all ? Nevertheless, the
large excesses in growth of Administration over Instruction are the most
striking features of these graphs.
The three UC campuses at Berkeley, Los Angeles and San Francisco are the
most mature and the most famous in terms of academic reputations; and these
three show the most extreme cases of large administrative growth with little
growth in their student populations and total Instructional staffs. Over the
past 25 years, Berkeley's combined Administrative staff has grown by 124% while
its student enrollment has grown by only 17% and its Instructional staff has
actually declined a tiny bit. Over this 25 years UCLA's combined
Administrative staff has increased by 132%, while its student enrollment has
increased by 37% and its Instructional staff has increased by 35%. At UCSF
(which is only a medical school without an undergraduate curriculum) the 25
year record shows a growth in combined administrative staff of 267%, with
student growth of 64% and Instructional staff growth of 58%.
These three campuses (UCB, UCLA, UCSF) are the most topheavy with
administrative bureaucracy. They show excesses of growth in Administratiion
over Instruction that amounts to 124%, 97%, and 209% respectively; and these
three campuses also show the largest current expenditures for Administration:
$74,063,000, $98,093,000, and $56,007,000, respectively.
In terms of sheer size, UCLA has the largest administration, with a
budgeted staff of 1524 and expenditures of $98 million in 1991-92. The second
largest is not a campus but the systemwide offices under the UC president:
Administrative staff budgeted at 1303 and expenditures of $80 million for the
last fiscal year.
[ I note with chagrin that President Jack W. Peltason has recently
appointed UCLA Chancellor Charles E. Young to head a new task force charged
with improving the efficiency of UC's management system. Young is the most
senior of all the UC Chancellors, having presided over UCLA for nearly the
entire twenty-five year history covered by this study.]
The other six UC campuses show a variety of histories of administrative
growth, which I leave to others to examine and interpret in detail. Note that
three of them - Irvine, San Diego, and Santa Cruz - started full undergraduate
programs only in the mid-1960s and expanded very rapidly in the latter part of
that decade; therefore, I have not included them in the graphical data displays
for the 25-year period.
The Conclusion, as in Report #2, is that an immense bureaucratic
overgrowth permeates the entire University of California and it will be a
Herculean job to clean out the waste that has accumulated. The continuing
budget crisis facing UC ought to provide sufficient motivation for
conscientious people within the university to undertake this challenging task.
{six bar graphs not reproduced in this e-mail version}
U C BERKELEY
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 9370 3712 602 648 2997 28727
1986-87 9108 3657 536 621 2960 29012
1981-82 8372 3515 487 652 2846 27009
1976-77 7794 3379 380 483 2756 27200
1971-72 7546 3346 316 435 2679 25512
1966-67 7305 3728 302 257 2803 24599
GROWTH IN UCB STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students -1%
Academics * 1%
Instr.Staff * 2%
Total Staff ** 3%
Gen.Admin. ****** 12%
Inst.Supp. ** 4%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students *** 6%
Academics *** 5%
Instr.Staff *** 6%
Total Staff ****** 12%
Gen.Admin. ************ 24%
Inst.Supp. -1%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students *** 6%
Academics ***** 9%
Instr.Staff ***** 10%
Total Staff ********** 20%
Gen.Admin. ***************************** 58%
Inst.Supp. ***************** 34%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ******* 13%
Academics ****** 12%
Instr.Staff ****** 11%
Total Staff ************ 24%
Gen.Admin. ********************************************** 91%
Inst.Supp. ************************* 49%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students ********* 17%
Academics **** 7%
Instr.Staff 0%
Total Staff ************** 28%
Gen.Admin. ************************************************** 99%
Inst.Supp. **********************:::***************************** 152%
UCB Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $802,739,000
ADMINISTRATION = $74,063,000 INSTRUCTION = $240,112,000
U C DAVIS
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 11876 3242 343 700 2802 22403
1986-87 9660 2786 294 571 2451 19096
1981-82 8836 2555 271 482 2277 18685
1976-77 8095 2271 240 430 2089 16783
1971-72 4385 1655 204 309 1470 13438
1966-67 3447 1903 167 180 1129 8737
GROWTH IN UCD STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ********* 17%
Academics ******* 14%
Instr.Staff ******** 16%
Total Staff ************ 23%
Gen.Admin. ********* 17%
Inst.Supp. ************ 23%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students ********** 20%
Academics ************ 23%
Instr.Staff ************** 27%
Total Staff ***************** 34%
Gen.Admin. ************** 27%
Inst.Supp. *********************** 45%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students ***************** 33%
Academics ***************** 34%
Instr.Staff ********************** 43%
Total Staff ************************ 47%
Gen.Admin. ********************** 43%
Inst.Supp. ******************************** 63%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ********************************** 67%
Academics ********************************************** 91%
Instr.Staff ************************************************ 96%
Total Staff ********************************:::********************** 171%
Gen.Admin. ********************************** 68%
Inst.Supp. ********************************:::********************** 127%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students ********************************:::********************** 156%
Academics ********************************:::********************** 148%
Instr.Staff *********************************** 70%
Total Staff ********************************:::********************** 245%
Gen.Admin. ***************************************************** 105%
Inst.Supp. ********************************:::********************** 289%
UCD Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $945,439,000
ADMINISTRATION = $50,231,000 INSTRUCTION = $211,661,000
U C IRVINE
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 6444 2189 282 225 1404 16287
1986-87 6049 1884 260 255 1157 13766
1981-82 5560 1642 222 188 915 10441
1976-77 4968 1445 194 153 808 9064
1971-72 1789 917 171 99 623 6519
1966-67 1031 604 114 46 399 2848
GROWTH IN UCI STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ********* 18%
Academics *********** 21%
Instr.Staff ******** 16%
Total Staff **** 7%
Gen.Admin. **** 8%
Inst.Supp. -12%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students **************************** 56%
Academics *************************** 53%
Instr.Staff ***************** 33%
Total Staff ******** 16%
Gen.Admin. ************** 27%
Inst.Supp. ********** 20%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students **************************************** 80%
Academics ************************************* 74%
Instr.Staff ************************** 51%
Total Staff *************** 30%
Gen.Admin. *********************** 45%
Inst.Supp. ************************ 47%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ********************************:::********************* 150%
Academics ********************************:::********************* 125%
Instr.Staff ********************************:::********************* 139%
Total Staff ********************************:::********************* 260%
Gen.Admin. ********************************* 65%
Inst.Supp. ********************************:::********************* 127%
(UC Irvine graduated its first class in 1966.)
UCI Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $600,096,000
ADMINISTRATION = $44,242,000 INSTRUCTION = $170,284,000
U C LOS ANGELES
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 14757 4688 662 862 3249 32617
1986-87 13697 4529 584 708 3180 30525
1981-82 13029 4202 551 504 3032 30525
1976-77 12337 4045 449 502 2920 28608
1971-72 10596 3799 381 485 2553 24424
1966-67 8415 3469 330 328 2440 23820
GROWTH IN UCLA STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students **** 7%
Academics * 2%
Instr.Staff ** 4%
Total Staff **** 8%
Gen.Admin. ******* 13%
Inst.Supp. *********** 22%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students **** 7%
Academics **** 7%
Instr.Staff ****** 12%
Total Staff ******* 13%
Gen.Admin. ********** 20%
Inst.Supp. ************************************ 71%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students ******* 14%
Academics ****** 11%
Instr.Staff ******** 16%
Total Staff ********** 20%
Gen.Admin. ************************ 47%
Inst.Supp. ************************************ 72%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ***************** 34%
Academics ************** 27%
Instr.Staff ************ 23%
Total Staff ******************** 39%
Gen.Admin. ************************************* 74%
Inst.Supp. *************************************** 78%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students ******************* 37%
Academics ***************** 33%
Instr.Staff ****************** 35%
Total Staff ************************************** 75%
Gen.Admin. *************************************************** 101%
Inst.Supp. ******************************:::********************** 163%
UCLA Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $1,581,815,000
ADMINISTRATION = $98,093,000 INSTRUCTION = $425,791,000
U C RIVERSIDE
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 2558 988 176 182 811 8425
1986-87 2168 726 153 152 609 5348
1981-82 2135 695 125 164 595 4424
1976-77 1978 632 116 124 585 4733
1971-72 2008 667 105 145 634 5394
1966-67 1579 836 93 60 523 3475
GROWTH IN UCR STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ***************************** 58%
Academics ***************** 33%
Instr.Staff ****************** 36%
Total Staff ********* 18%
Gen.Admin. ******** 15%
Inst.Supp. ********** 20%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students ********************************************* 90%
Academics ****************** 36%
Instr.Staff ********************* 42%
Total Staff ********** 20%
Gen.Admin. ********************* 41%
Inst.Supp. ****** 11%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students *************************************** 78%
Academics ******************** 39%
Instr.Staff **************************** 56%
Total Staff *************** 29%
Gen.Admin. ************************** 52%
Inst.Supp. ************************ 47%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students **************************** 56%
Academics ************** 28%
Instr.Staff ************************ 48%
Total Staff ************** 27%
Gen.Admin. ********************************** 68%
Inst.Supp. ************* 26%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students ********************************:::******************** 142%
Academics **************************** 55%
Instr.Staff ********* 18%
Total Staff ******************************* 62%
Gen.Admin. ********************************************* 89%
Inst.Supp. *********************************:::******************* 203%
UCR Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $191,614,000
ADMINISTRATION = $20,100,000 INSTRUCTION = $64,128,000
U C SAN DIEGO
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 8365 2076 477 456 1880 17181
1986-87 7266 1890 377 338 1645 15080
1981-82 6450 1594 297 336 1352 11892
1976-77 5206 1252 257 400 1158 9725
1971-72 4348 888 208 278 843 5872
1966-67 2281 460 165 124 385 2148
GROWTH IN UCSD STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ******* 14%
Academics ******* 14%
Instr.Staff ***** 10%
Total Staff ******** 15%
Gen.Admin. ************** 27%
Inst.Supp. ****************** 35%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students ********************** 44%
Academics ******************** 39%
Instr.Staff *************** 30%
Total Staff *************** 30%
Gen.Admin. ******************************* 61%
Inst.Supp. ****************** 36%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students *************************************** 77%
Academics ******************************* 62%
Instr.Staff ********************************* 66%
Total Staff ******************************* 61%
Gen.Admin. ******************************************* 86%
Inst.Supp. ******* 14%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ***********************************:::***************** 193%
Academics ***********************************:::***************** 123%
Instr.Staff ***********************************:::***************** 134%
Total Staff ********************************************** 92%
Gen.Admin. ***********************************:::***************** 129%
Inst.Supp. ******************************** 64%
(UC San Diego began a general undergraduate program in 1966.)
UCSD Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $886,462,000
ADMINISTRATION = $52,332,000 INSTRUCTION = $182,611,000
U C SAN FRANCISCO
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 6052 1506 447 460 757 3672
1986-87 5757 1503 289 365 768 3556
1981-82 5765 1447 281 253 766 3684
1976-77 5447 1365 241 220 727 3419
1971-72 4701 1058 216 225 566 2683
1966-67 3717 956 136 111 483 2240
GROWTH IN UCSF STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ** 3%
Academics -1%
Instr.Staff 0%
Total Staff *** 5%
Gen.Admin. **************************** 55%
Inst.Supp. ************* 26%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students 0%
Academics -1%
Instr.Staff ** 4%
Total Staff *** 5%
Gen.Admin. ****************************** 59%
Inst.Supp. ***************************************** 82%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students **** 7%
Academics ** 4%
Instr.Staff ***** 10%
Total Staff ****** 11%
Gen.Admin. ******************************************* 85%
Inst.Supp. ******************************************************* 109%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ******************* 37%
Academics ***************** 34%
Instr.Staff ********************* 42%
Total Staff *************** 29%
Gen.Admin. ****************************************************** 107%
Inst.Supp. **************************************************** 104%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students ******************************** 64%
Academics ***************************** 57%
Instr.Staff ***************************** 58%
Total Staff ******************************** 63%
Gen.Admin. ****************************************:::************* 229%
Inst.Supp. ****************************************:::************* 314%
UCSF Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $1,034,198,000
ADMINISTRATION = $56,007,000 INSTRUCTION = $147,837,000
U C SANTA BARBARA
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 3451 1820 193 236 1383 17270
1986-87 3541 1655 169 225 1272 17159
1981-82 3014 1450 157 199 1103 14706
1976-77 2780 1359 140 156 1042 13824
1971-72 2766 1326 125 143 1014 11471
1966-67 2029 1085 110 55 887 10153
GROWTH IN UCSB STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students * 1%
Academics ***** 9%
Instr.Staff ***** 10%
Total Staff -3%
Gen.Admin. ******* 14%
Inst.Supp. *** 5%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students ********* 17%
Academics ************* 25%
Instr.Staff ************* 26%
Total Staff ******* 14%
Gen.Admin. ************ 23%
Inst.Supp. ********** 19%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students ************* 25%
Academics ***************** 33%
Instr.Staff ***************** 34%
Total Staff ************ 24%
Gen.Admin. ******************* 38%
Inst.Supp. ************************** 51%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students ************************** 51%
Academics ****************** 36%
Instr.Staff ******************* 37%
Total Staff ************* 25%
Gen.Admin. *************************** 54%
Inst.Supp. ********************************* 65%
Increase over the last 25 years
Students *********************************** 70%
Academics **************************** 56%
Instr.Staff ********************************** 68%
Total Staff *********************************** 70%
Gen.Admin. ************************************** 75%
Inst.Supp. ***************************************:::************* 329%
UCSB Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $309,121,000
ADMINISTRATION = $29,404,000 INSTRUCTION = $100,957,000
U C SANTA CRUZ
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 2385 1066 179 195 784 9789
1986-87 1952 872 127 177 624 8304
1981-82 1648 707 107 140 517 6619
1976-77 1449 640 117 99 495 6013
1971-72 1111 432 106 86 341 4209
1966-67 563 220 90 24 179 1273
GROWTH IN UCSC STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Students ********* 18%
Academics ************* 26%
Instr.Staff *********** 22%
Total Staff *********** 22%
Gen.Admin. ********************* 41%
Inst.Supp. ***** 10%
Increase over the last 10 years
Students ************************ 48%
Academics ************************** 52%
Instr.Staff ************************** 51%
Total Staff *********************** 45%
Gen.Admin. ********************************** 67%
Inst.Supp. ******************** 39%
Increase over the last 15 years
Students ******************************** 63%
Academics ***************************** 58%
Instr.Staff ********************************** 67%
Total Staff ********************************* 65%
Gen.Admin. *************************** 53%
Inst.Supp. ************************************************* 97%
Increase over the last 20 years
Students **************************************:::*************** 133%
Academics **************************************:::*************** 130%
Instr.Staff **************************************:::*************** 147%
Total Staff **********************************************************115%
Gen.Admin. *********************************** 69%
Inst.Supp. ***************************************:::************** 127%
(UC Santa Cruz graduated its first class in 1966.)
UCSC Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92: TOTAL = $183,671,000
ADMINISTRATION = $19,472,000 INSTRUCTION = $58,850,000
U C SYSTEMWIDE ADMINISTRATION
STAFF & STUDENTS (FTE) AS BUDGETED OVER 25 YEARS
YEAR Total Staff Instr.Staff Gen.Admin. Inst.Supp. Academics Students
1991-92 1795 87 639 664 73 0
1986-87 1624 71 574 549 65 0
1981-82 1518 66 495 523 76 0
1976-77 1508 66 576 571 66 0
1971-72 1313 64 442 620 78 0
1966-67 789 32 288 456 21 0
GROWTH IN UC-SYSTEMWIDE STAFF (FTE) OVER 25 YEARS
Increase over the last 5 years
Total Staff ****** 11%
Gen.Admin. ****** 11%
Inst.Supp. *********** 21%
Increase over the last 10 years
Total Staff ********* 18%
Gen.Admin. *************** 29%
Inst.Supp. ************** 27%
Increase over the last 15 years
Total Staff ********** 19%
Gen.Admin. ****** 11%
Inst.Supp. ******** 16%
Increase over the last 20 years
Total Staff ******************* 37%
Gen.Admin. *********************** 45%
Inst.Supp. **** 7%
Increase over the last 25 years
Total Staff *************************************:::***************** 128%
Gen.Admin. *************************************:::***************** 122%
Inst.Supp. *********************** 46%
UC-Systemwide Current Funds Expenditures for 1991-92:
TOTAL = $256,889,000
ADMINISTRATION = $79,564,000.